she writes:
[M]ore representation for feminism across the spectrum of political beliefs is a
good thing. Women, like men, should be able to disagree on gun ownership,
environmental policies, taxes, even abortion while agreeing on gender equity.
At the 1990 Senate hearings on the bill, Biden proudly reported that he
and his brothers were forbidden to lay a hand on their sister even in
self-defense, while she enjoyed "absolute impunity"—and added, apparently not as
a joke, that he had "the bruises to prove it." This is not equality; it's
chivalry masquerading as feminism.
Ultimately, women should vote on the
basis of a candidate's ideas and ability, not gender. But in the contest of the
vice presidential candidates, Palin represents by far the better version of
female empowerment. Regardless of how we vote or who wins, that empowering
message is here to stay.
I am not a woman, so to speak on behalf of one would be foolish, but I would like to think that feminism should be all about equality, and freedom to do whatever you want, be that V.P. or motherhood, or both. It is human nature to want more than other people in order to validate your place. But just like in a band, all instruments/sounds need to be at specific volumes to make the music whole. Nobody likes to hear an overwhelmingly loud bass solo.
3 comments:
here's and interesting article on the housing crisis.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0
Nice article Mark. Check out this article from 1999, regarding Fannie and Freddie opening up to more subprime mortages. And all at the proding of WJC. (Bill Clinton)
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE7DB153EF933A0575AC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
Basically, lending restrictions were softened by a government sponsored institution so that banks would stop "discriminating" against minorities all at the expense of taxpayers. Very convenient for the recipients of most sub-prime loans who probably don't pay much in taxes if any at all. Never mind the fact that these people can't afford these loans and you end of forcing many of them into bankruptcy. Another government social program hard at work to better society by transferring wealth to those who really deserve it. Do people really still give Bill Clinton credit for the economy?
Post a Comment