Stop Global Warming

stopglobalwarming.org teaches about global warming, and how to stop it (in case you want to). Apparently all the science points to a unanimous consensus such that further study on the cause of global warming appears to be worthless.

The results are in and the reality of global warming is beyond dispute or
debate. It’s not just an environmental issue. It affects our public health
and national security. It’s an urgent matter of survival for everyone on
the planet — the most urgent threat facing humanity today. It’s going to
take action from you and all of us working together. Global warming isn’t
opinion. It’s a scientific reality. And the science tells us that human
activity has made enormous impacts to our planet that affect our well-being
and even our survival as a species.

The world’s leading science
journals report that glaciers are melting ten times faster than previously
thought, that atmospheric greenhouse gases have reached levels not seen for
millions of years, and that species are vanishing as a result of
climate
change. They also report of extreme weather events, long-term droughts, and
rising sea levels.

Roy Spencer testified before congress on June 22, 2008, mostly explaining that the climate models used in many research in global warming are not all correct.

While it will take some time for the research community to
digest this new information, it must be mentioned that new research
contradicting the latest IPCC report is entirely consistent with the normal
course of scientific progress. I predict that in the coming years, there will be
a growing realization among the global warming research community that most of
the climate change we have observed is natural, and that mankind’s role is
relatively minor.

I hope that the Committee realizes that, if true, these new
results mean that humanity will be largely spared the negative consequences of
human-induced climate change. This would be good news that should be celebrated
— not attacked and maligned.
And given that virtually no research into
possible natural explanations for global warming has been performed, it is time
for scientific objectivity and integrity to be restored to the field of global
warming research. This Committee could, at a minimum, make a statement that
encourages that goal.

Any valid study that shows discrepancies in the "established, beyond dispute or debate" science should be celebrated. People that so adamantly insist on environmental impact studies for any new development, are so willing to believe that the earth is imminent peril, that they are willing to stop as much carbon producing industry as to revert back to life as it was in the 1800's, without an objective evaluation of the science. And taking the country's economy down with it.

They don't want the price of gas lower, that would mean more carbon emitting cars.

They don't want a thriving polar bear, that would mean admitting the arctic really isn't melting away.

I learned pretty early on in my scholastic career that if any question on a test spoke in absolutes it was mostly likely wrong. If true in medical science, why would it differ in climate science?